Developers call for cooling measures review amid hefty $100m charges

Romesh Navaratnarajah19 Feb 2016

condo resize

 

Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (Redas) President Augustine Tan has urged the government to review the property cooling measures as developers face potential charges of $100 million for unsold private residential units, reported TODAYonline.

“The real estate market is reeling from the compounding effects of an oversupply situation, rising vacancy rates, weak demand and increasing interest rates,” said Tan at the association’s Spring Festival Lunch.

“There is therefore an urgent need for action to bring stability and ensure a soft landing to prevent further damage to the fragile economy,” he added, citing turmoil in financial markets, Singapore’s own restructuring journey and weak global growth as risks to the economy.

As at end-2015, there is a supply of more than 60,000 units in the pipeline and a record 25,000 vacant units, noted Tan, who also serves as Far East Organization’s Executive Director for Property Sales.

Aside from the mounting supply, developers also face pressures from measures like the Qualifying Certificate (QC) and Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD).

First introduced in 2011 and revised in 2013, the ABSD is a tax imposed on both developers and individual property buyers.

The amount paid by individuals depends on the number of properties they own and residency status, while developers have to pay 10 to 15 percent of the land cost unless they complete and sell all the units within five years from the date of land acquisition.

Developers with foreign holdings will also have to meet the QC rules, in which they are required to complete the project in five years of acquiring the land and sell all units within the next two years. Those who need more time to meet the requirements can pay extension charges that are pro-rated according to the proportion of unsold units. Land sold on Sentosa Cove and through the Government Land Sales (GLS) Programme do not need QC.

In 2016, Tan estimates that around 700 unsold residential units across 13 developments will be affected by the QC, with charges amounting to almost $100 million.

Moreover, the ABSD remission clawback for projects with unsold units will kick in by end-2016, putting further pressure on prices. He revealed that around 6,000 unsold units in 33 developments will be affected by the ABSD remission clawback in 2017 and 2018.

As a result, several developers have been lobbying for the removal of the ABSD, arguing that the Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) framework will help ensure that buyers stay prudent with their acquisitions even without the ABSD.

“Since 2009, the successive introduction of the government’s property measures has cooled the market, bringing down transactions and prices. With safeguards in place such as the continuation of the prudent TDSR measures together with the current economic situation, property prices will be kept in check,” said Tan.

“It is therefore timely to consider a calibration of the cooling measures.”

 

Romesh Navaratnarajah, Senior Editor at PropertyGuru, edited this story. To contact him about this or other stories email romesh@propertyguru.com.sg

Ha YF
Feb 22, 2016
1. Land is scarce is Singapore. 2. Housing prices keeps going up. 3. Govt has promised to keep housing affordable during the elections. 4. So govt brings down the prices. 5. But sellers refuse to sell low. The policies are in place for a reason. Demand is still strong. Prices are falling but very gradually. No market crash in sight. All developers have deep pockets. They can afford to pay the extension charges (which is peanuts to them). I suggest wait and see another year.
Colin
Feb 20, 2016
if govt wants to remove ABSD, should only remove the buyer portion only. The developers ABSD should remain. otherwise they will have no pressure to maintain competitive price to sell off the units and may even increase price, hoping consumers will blink first. the ABSD profit just goes from government back to developers. consumers always lose no matter what.
Vipul Lal
Feb 20, 2016
Couldn't agree more with the above comment by Kathy. The developers created a lot of hype and drive up the prices and their profits. Thank God we have a government who foresaw the economic downturn and introduced the cooling measures. I feel that these measures should stay. These measures only drive out the speculators who drive up the prices. Genuine buyers who want to buy for their own stay are not touched by these measures. Love the way our government acted.
Jon
Feb 20, 2016
Singapore economy is very bad now. The curb should lifted immediately.
Tan
Feb 20, 2016
Even if measures are and should be tweaked, they should apply only to new developments, not existing ones subject to levy. Otherwise those that played by the rules and already paid up sure cry foul if there are subsequent preferential treatment. Aiya, u know the rules of the game, lose and u pay, it's all business. 100 mil collected can do a lot of good for the general public than to just a few boardroom members.
Homme
Feb 19, 2016
The richest people in Singapore deal with property. The prices have barely moderated and they are calling it a crisis. Their crisis. Most people take years to pay off their mortgage. If the housing prices are not high.. What is. The best part is... They market their property like some luxurious abode. In fact, they look pretty much the same. Yup, more of the same apartments with views looking into others apartments. Care to sit on your Bay window, drink coffee and enjoy the Vista. Vista of your neighbor's living room perhaps. Thankfully the government has some decent people to keep things in check.
Kathy
Feb 19, 2016
Why can't the developers drastically lower prices instead of clamouring for the government to help them? They comment that the economic outlook is uncertain, yet they have no qualms getting more into people into debt...
Chan Tuck Sing
Feb 19, 2016
Moreover some of this developers are foreign own. The foreign developers build houses in Singapore and earning alot of Singaporean's money before. If the govt help them now, they better answer to the general public...
Ricky
Feb 19, 2016
When property price was climbing upwards, why property developers did not say their profit is too much and request govt to push for more cooling measures ?? Now that most developers are still making profit (although lower) but yet they are asking govt to remove some cooling measures (so that they can make more profit ?). To me, developers are mostly selfish business people who are only interested in making huge profit and don't really care if the property market is over heated or not.
POST COMMENT

You may also like these articles

Mortgagee listings surge on the back of staff cuts: DTZ

One of the properties being put up for auction. (Photo: DTZ) The economic slowdown and soft leasing market has led to staff cuts, which caused some affected homeowners to have difficulty financing

Continue Reading18 Feb 2016

Yio Chu Kang EC site draws 10 bids

Map of the Yio Chu Kang Road residential site. Source: HDB The tender for an executive condominium (EC) site at Yio Chu Kang Road closed on Thursday (18 Feb), after attracting 10 bids, according to

Continue Reading18 Feb 2016

Foreign student fined $40,000 for unlicensed estate agency work

Photo of the CEA’s reception area. Source: CEA    A Chinese national on a student pass was fined $40,000 last December after he pleaded guilty to four charges of acting as an unlicensed estate

Continue Reading19 Feb 2016