Spike in UOB's housing non-performing loans

Muneerah 17 Sep 2014

UOB saw a 34.2 percent quarter-on-quarter spike in its housing non-performing loans (NPL) in Q2 2014, according to a report by Maybank Kim Eng.

Given the perception that UOB is one of Singapore’s more conservative home lenders, with only a slight year-to-date correction in Singapore’s house prices, the sharp spike in UOB’s housing NPLs took the market by surprise.

“We understand its NPLs were isolated to a group of borrowers who had invested in Turquoise, a high-end condominium project in Sentosa,” said Maybank in a report.

URA data showed that two units there changed hands in Q2 2014 at 45 percent discount to their launch prices.

The report noted that the transactions “stoked fears that it is a matter of time before default cases become widespread, undermining Singapore banks’ profitability that has been propped up by low charge-off rates.”

To ascertain sentiment on the Sentosa micromarket, Maybank examined recent transactions of non-landed properties there.

It found that there are nine condominium projects in Sentosa. The first four, launched during the nascent recovery of Singapore’s property market in 2004 to 2005, had an average selling price of below $1,600 psf, while the remaining five, which were launched later, were priced above $2,600 psf.

“In our view, the large losses at Turquoise can be partially explained by the project’s higher launch price,” said Maybank.

Notably, Turquoise’s launch price of $2,605 psf is about 75 percent higher than the average price at The Oceanfront ($1,360 psf) and The Coast ($1,592).

“These two were launched one year ahead of Turquoise. This could mean that higher-priced projects at Sentosa are at greater risk of a price correction,” said the report.

Image source: Ho Bee Land’s website

 

Muneerah Bee, Senior Journalist at PropertyGuru, edited this story. To contact her about this or other stories email muneerah@propertyguru.com.sg

Just silly investors
Sep 17, 2014
Buy high when the surrounding projects are sold at a low. So, blame no one except poor fore-sight and poor business sense. Again, developers laughing all the way.
POST COMMENT

You may also like these articles

China's rich still prefer to live in Singapore

A growing number of the world’s super-rich are choosing to live in more than one country, with many of them parking their substantial wealth in overseas real estate, according to new findings from t

Continue Reading16 Sep 2014

Cost overrun led to $10.7 million loss

TEE International has announced yesterday it made a loss of $10.69 million, instead of a profit of $8.26 million as reported earlier. In a statement, the Singapore-listed company said, “The varia

Continue Reading16 Sep 2014

Fewer foreigners being hired, lowest since 2009

The number of jobs that went to foreigners fell to 3,800 in the second quarter of 2014, its lowest level since Q3 2009 when 700 jobs were created for foreign workers, according to a recent statement f

Continue Reading17 Sep 2014